![ck2 how to have gay sex ck2 how to have gay sex](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/kfG5mmx4bfQhjW28Y4qxEW.jpg)
In the Middle East, we have conflicting accounts. While China isn't in-game, China historically was incredibly accepting of homosexual acts, many of the most romantic medieval novels or stories including homosexual and heterosexual sexual acts on the same level, Japan as well, and Thailand has a long history of transgender women. Many ancient Indian texts DID refer to a third gender known as Hijra, which has turned into a gender-movement in South and South-east Asia that has no western equivalent, but there's no history I can find of anything more than disapproval of homosexuality across much of India. One of them had sexual relations with a landed lord, and the heir of a second landed lord, both of whom were put to death for Sodomy.
![ck2 how to have gay sex ck2 how to have gay sex](https://untoldhistorytour.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Nerone.jpg)
![ck2 how to have gay sex ck2 how to have gay sex](https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/isis_flag013-e1477939289130.jpg)
In England alone in the time period, 3 kings are considered to possibly have had homosexual relations (as we have no proof that there was any idea of sexual orientations or identities, the best we can do is talk of homosexual relations and homosexual attractions). In a game that spans from the 8th to the 15th centuries, from Spain to India, approaches to homosexuality were by no means all the same across history. Homosexuality is a huge opportunity for inclusion in a game that represents only the most elitest of the elites of medieval society. If your identity is so challenged by the idea that other people may want other identities represented historically accurately such that your identity is not the 100% dominant identity of the period as you assumed it to be, than I would ask everyone to seriously relook at their values. Games are important representations of culture in our world and it's important to have proper representation of all oppressed minorities where they existed and not whitewash/straightwash/ciswash/malewash/otherdominantgroupwash history. My suggestions on how to improve this don't matter, but I would like very much for someone to read this and know that you've deepy offended one of your customers based on their sexual orientation.ĭespite how clumsly worded this all was, I'd like to add: Or at least, I think it should try to be. Try to make me understand, dear PDX community at large, why on earth this is okay? The game may be set in the 8th-14th centuries, but it's being produced in the 21st century. Because there isn't a gay person on the dev team and they wouldn't think that applying global negative modifiers simply for being gay could be offensive, "because this is the middle ages and it simply was not done." Or at least that's how I'm feeling. Does it matter that you only shag your manservant twice a month, in the servant's broom cupboard? Is there even an 'outting' mechanic? Of course not. and it becomes clear that everyone knows the moment your wrist starts to limp. First, there's the fact that you'll have a great deal of difficulty propagating your house, no matter how many times you close your eyes and think of Engand whilst bedding your bride (-20% of average base 50% to fertility). Beyond the fact that you'll hardly ever see the homosexual trait in game, when you do, it is very well worth noting that everything about the situation is designed to make you hate playing as the character in question. I'm not going to rant for four paragraphs about how oppresive Paradox is to gays, but I think it is worth noting that homosexuality in game is very rare, considering how widespread it in fact was for a man to commit that most attrocious of sins, Sodomy.